The court declined to dismiss copyright infringement claims against the AI companies. The order could implicate other firms that used Stable Diffusion, the AI model at issue in the case.

The USCO did allow that if Kashtanova could exhibit “substantive edits” to an AI-generated image, those edits could prove human authorship and therefore qualify the image for copyright protection.

Getty Images is suing Stability AI, developers of the AI tool Stable Diffusion, for stealing copyrighted images to train its algorithms.

This signifies the acknowledgment of Getty Images' allegations regarding copyright infringement related to the utilization of its materials for training AI models.

After months of review, the office ruled on Tuesday that the book would keep it's copyright protection, but the the AI-generated images would not because they are "not the product of human ...

In a decision with vast implications, the Supreme Court ruled that Andy Warhol's images of Prince violated the original photographer's copyright. Plus Icon Film Plus Icon TV ...