Courtly Observations is a recurring series by Erwin Chemerinsky that focuses on what the Supreme Court’s decisions will mean ...

A Supreme Court decision demonstrates a new degree of cimperiousness, seeming to co-sign the Trump administration’s contempt ...

Supreme Court Justice Jackson's judicial approach differs from colleagues due to her district court background, with analysis ...

The Supreme Court 'could have simply decided that the 14th Amendment's clear mandate that "all persons born or naturalized in ...

And they need to look elsewhere for constitutional change.

The ruling left unsettled the question of whether children born to immigrants without full legal status in the United States ...

Never before has the Supreme Court imposed such restrictions on the ability of courts to provide relief against ...

Yesterday, in a 6–3 decision in Trump v. CASA, the United States Supreme Court sided with the Trump administration in a case ...

The justices ordered the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, to review its decision that West Virginia’s ...

The justices’ regular caseload was overshadowed by requests from the president to allow some of his most controversial ...

As the conservative justices noted, the decision in Dobbs vs. Jackson Women’s Health did not outlaw abortion nationwide.

FOX News contributor and GWU law professor Jonathan Turley weighs in on Justice Amy Coney Barrett's rebuke of Justice Ketanji ...